I began my conversation with Tim by trying to explain my idea. Collaborative Consumption… What about it? I struggled explaining it.
I tried to back up my definition with examples of Uber, Onzo, Lime, Netflix, ect. This made it clearer but only because he knew what they were.
Tim said I need a definition like the following, “The sharing economy, also known as the access economy, peer-to-peer economy, or collaborative economy is a mode of consumption whereby goods and services are not owned by a single user, but rather only temporarily accessed by members of a network and under-utilised assets are shared, either for free or for a fee.”
- Shared ownership of goods
- Accessed by members of a network.
He gave me a really interesting statement he created for his sustainable fashion brand Starfish.
Pay more, buy better, buy less.
Tim Parkin
He suggested that I look less into the huge problem of hyper-consumption and find circumstances where design has fixed other huge problems and reapply the lessons learned to attacking hyper-consumption.
It is important to realise that I will not solve the problem. I am merely contributing to the field. Which means I have to pick a small aspect of where I want to go.
- So what is my problem. What is my objective?
- Why aren’t consumers currently participating in more creative practices?
- What makes hyper-consumption desirable?